In the internet world, there has been a lot of drama surrounding KSI, Logan Paul, and Mr. Beast’s newest product Lunchly, which is a new rebranded and apparently “better” version of Lunchables. Many people have opinions on the topic, some hate and some enjoy it. So today we will be getting to the bottom of this. Is Lunchly better than Lunchables simply because of who created it?
KSI, Logan Paul, and Mr. Beast decided to find a new way to make money by selling Lunchly. Other internet creators have voiced their opinions on Lunchly. DanTDM asked, “how does this benefit your fans?” Implying that it has no value to the fans of their videos. It’s simply unhealthy food made in a lab being sold as a new version of Lunchables, although they do not correlate.
Let’s see what the people of Timberlane have to say about this topic. Joseph Messersmith thinks that Lunchables is the original, and Lunchly is a mimic and a knockoff. Nick Dinapoli, and Anderson Petry both haven’t had lunchables in a long time but think lunchables is the original and shouldn’t be rivaled by an obvious knock off. Evan Mono, and Troy Stoddard think that this is a publicity stunt and is only for KSI, Logan Paul and Mr. Beast’s own personal gain.
We can’t get a proper taste test comparison on the product because Lunchly is only sold at Kroger locations, which are mainly down south and out of our reach. But we got a lot of opinion based answers and saw many different perspectives on the topic. Most people in Timberlane think that this is not them trying to please their fans, rather to benefit themselves off of their fans.
